At a time when we are collapsing under the flow of information from the polls, repeated in a loop by the media, I think that this little French information page will be beneficial to you. I spoke to you yesterday in the Newsflash of a desire for group synergy, and that's how last night, Alice, alias Voltigeur, sheep decidedly " enraged » ; ) sent me this lovely piece of information. As I told you, if I take up certain denunciations exploited by the FN, it is not out of partisan spirit, but to better denounce IMPOSTORS. Regarding a recent media event announced with great fanfare (but which I did not cover ; )). Alice got this info from her network:
But who is this charming gentleman, on the left of our, 'as Pierre Jovanovic says friendly', "Marine", who so photogenically replaces his father in the photo?
This pleasant man, and a priori friendly, but whose look does not deceive anyone, is called Franz Schönhuber.
According Wikipedia, after getting his High School in 1942 to Munich, Schönhuber "militated" in the German Hitler Youth, then he joined the NSDAP. It was then that, strong in his convictions, he committed himself at the age of 19 to the SS Charlemagne Division. Where, after being sent to the front, it is thanks to his experience that he would have been an instructor of the division. He was logically rewarded and decorated with the iron Cross.
He is the author of a partisan biography on Jean-Marie Le Pen in 1997 "Le Pen, der Rebell" (Le Pen, the rebel), and attended his thunderous conference on December 5, 1997 in Munich, where the latter describes the gas chambers as “detail”.
He was a candidate for Bundestag in 1998, under the list Deutsche Volks Union, and then wrote for the nationalist newspaper Deutsche Nationalzeitung. In 2001, Franz Schönhuber wrote with Horst Mahler "Schluss mit dem deutschen Selbsthass" (Ending German self-hatred), where he castigates "repentance" and "popular hatred of the German nation".
February 13 2005, he organizes with Udo Voigt, Holger Apfel, Gerhard Frey, a meeting of 5.000 people in Dresden to commemorate the anniversary of 60 years after the bombardment of Dresden. Franz Schönhuber, after a long and generous political and journalistic career, was invested as a candidate for Dresden by NPD for the federal elections of October 2, 2005. He obtained 2,4% of the votes. Since it is the best who leave first, it is therefore a victim of the fact that the best jokes always have an end, that he died on November 27, 2005 (at age 82) in Munich, this following an unfortunate pulmonary embolism...
So why hurt yourself and talk about these things? Hum!... Maybe because I like to 'launch real debates'? Or, perhaps to denounce a certain orientation of the propaganda, even, I dare the word: instrumentalization of the ambient misery? Perhaps also because a concordant flow of information brings us back across the Atlantic towards certain interests? Interests which, moreover, are currently in action around the world ? These same people and interests who provided 90% of the oil (Exxon) and a good part of its logistics (Ford, Bell) for payment to Hitler to invade Europe and the USSR, and who then had to defend themselves, because he turned against them ? These same people who, in 1943, when Nicolas Tesla died, silenced his discoveries, and selfishly capitalized on his inventions in order to create weapons capable of triggering hurricanes, storms et earthquakes. While depriving the world of free and clean energy, more infinite...? These same concordant interests which, among other things, have imposed on us the captivity of our democratic Europe and the end of our national monetary independence through the capitulation of our Banque de France ? Again these same non-values which are the real concrete and global incarnation of politics mammonic. These same groups of people who, like big modern pharaonic lazybones, faithful to their worship of the Egyptian gods and Sumerians, have, through their elites, lamentably and irremediably destroyed all their means of production. And who, in their unique capitalist logic, now have no choice but to vampirize the fruit of the labor of the entire planet. Because strong in the power of their 5113 nuclear warheads, they can impose their vision and their reign until Libya. It is therefore like dealers that they live off their rents and submit the planet to its addiction to the dollar. All financed by infinite unfair competition and instrumentalized through their diabolical "virtual financial products", allowing them to redeem the whole world, however. But that's not all, that's not enough for them... Because their policy of "services" based abroad, historically based on complicit state and industrial powers, allows them to put the peoples of the world in slavery and in free competition, with each other, with consequences which are in no way virtual. Isn't this the very definition of “free capitalism”?
So, to keep this all going 'smoothly', guess who, brazenly, now seems resolutely determined to vote for you?… The CFR and CIA, does that speak to you? Definitely it's good because I like to 'raise debates'. I tell you that once again the suppositions seem to be confirmed formidably. It is not a question of speculation or fabrication here, but of facts ! So, what if Marine Le Pen or the American Dominique Strauss-Kahn were only the calculated and unstoppable consequence of the imposed Atlanticist Nicolas S. ? Have you ever thought about it? Order Ab Chaos ! The haphazard policy of the looter Nicolas S. then takes on a whole new meaning... The future has this great thing about it, it is that it is not fixed, it is dynamic!
However, I will recall the incestuous links between Charles Pasqua and.... But seriously, between Charlie and the chocolate factory, Obama and Mammon, for me there is no photo. One is stupid and Gallic, the other is American and devilishly greedy, and the impact does not seem to me to be (at first) the same... Even if in the end they are both too humanly attracted to their demonic counterparts.
Finally, on Alice's clues, you will definitely see that (while the latter is blindly repeated in a loop) the mastery of information is currently CRUCIAL...
Also, without delay, I bring my little stone to the media edifice, with below this resumption of the article of .... I will discreetly add for your intention, dear French men and women, you who are all blondes with blue eyes..., like "Marine" and her illustrious father... That concordant flows of information indicate that she is already looking for a specialist in " biometrics », this certainly for her future government, in order to sculpt a France in their « image » (moreover, I noted that she seems so carried away by this poll, that she lowers her defense, and like a little girl , jubilant on TV. This is almost embarrassing, which inspires a lot (below) Roland Dumas).
Just saying…
I therefore leave you in the hands of this article, made by the small fleshy and probably hairy handcuffs of the meticulous fairies members of the...; ) (to whom we say hello; ))
Good and informative read...
The whole of the French political scene was shaken, on March 5 and 7, by the publication in quick succession of two polls, both published by the newspaper Le Parisien, both carried out by the Harris Interactive "institute", and both giving Mrs. Le Pen the lead of the 1er turn to the presidential election which will take place in more than a year.
In the first, Ms. Le Pen (FN) was credited with 23% in the first round of the presidential election, ahead of Nicolas Sarkozy and Martine Aubry (PS), each credited with 21%. In the second, she was credited with 24%, ahead of Nicolas Sarkozy and Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
This media operation left a deep sense of unease in public opinion because many people smelled something artificial in it, as if it were a question of distorting and biasing the electoral debate and the choice of voters from the start. French a year before the presidential elections.
This is the reason why it is important to come back to this whole affair and, in particular, to go in search of the sponsors of the whole operation.
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
1- ALLEGED “POLLS” WITHOUT ANY SCIENTIFIC VALUE
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
On the Rue89 site, Mr. Jacques Le Bohec, professor of information sciences, specified that these Harris Interactive "polls", carried out via the Internet, had “used the worst of the techniques that exist since it does not make it possible to ensure the sincerity of the answers (of almost nothing elsewhere) ».
Dissecting the rare information available on the “technique” used, Mr. Le Bohec listed the points which removed any scientific value from these investigations:
- they are far too far from the date of the vote to make sense: the results obtained are necessarily marred by “ playful, defiant or protest responses”
- the rare quotas retained by the pollsters are too insufficient (diploma, tenant/owner) and are too encompassing (“inactive”) to obtain a representative sample.
- the daughter of Jean-Marie Le Pen presenting "fewer negative stigmas" than her father, "there is a good chance that voters will more easily admit their future vote in his favor" and the very important "adjustment coefficient about voting intentions towards her" is probably not relevant (the results in favor of Mrs. Le Pen being flat-rate multiplied by 1,5 to take into account this alleged reluctance of the "respondents" to confess their vote) .
The information science professor concludes that Ms. Le Pen's real score, far from reaching 23% of the vote, probably does not exceed 16% and wonders:
“Shouldn't we, before throwing away any figures, be sure that the answers are sincere, that the sample is representative and that we have to straighten it out? Unless it is a smoky operation intended to make DSK essential? »
http://www.rue89.com/2011/03/06/sondage-marine-le-pen-a-23-au-premier-tour-peu-probable-193620
Add to this analysis that Harris Interactive's "sample" is made up of people who agreed to answer scores of surveys, including political ones, VS.
Asked about this disturbing question, Jean-Daniel Lévy, the director of the opinion department of Harris Interactive France, admitted it bluntly:
« To attract customers and motivate them to respond to their survey, carried out on the internet, the institute organized a competition and dangled a reward. In the end, €7.000 was offered to one of the approximately 1.600 panel members. »
It is useful to recall here that a 2006 study by Esomar quoted by the Survey Observatory had established that 54% of Internet respondents admitted to lying to earn a bonus. http://www.observatoire-des-sondages.org/L-artefact-Marine-Le-Pen-la.html
It is also worth noting that, among the arguments used by Harris Interactive to invite Internet users to register for their online survey "Harris Poll On Line", is this explicit argument:
“By participating in Harris Poll On Line, you can influence decision makers in government, nonprofits and businesses and help shape policy. »
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
2 – THE OVERMEDIATIZATION OF LE PEN POLLS IS A DISINFORMATION OPERATION
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
The two "polls" published in quick succession by Harris Interactive thus being devoid of any scientific value, another "institute" could perfectly well have produced other "polls" presenting Ms. Le Pen obtaining 14% or 16% of the votes and failing to pass the stage of the second round.
However, these two Harris Interactive polls benefited from media orchestration on a scale that had not been seen for several years. All the televisions, all the radios and all the great written press propelled this “information” to the forefront of national and even world news.
Connoisseurs immediately recognized a large-scale disinformation operation, according to the definition given by Vladimir Volkoff: the "disinformation is a manipulation of public opinion, for political purposes, with information processed by devious means" (In Disinformation, flagrante delicto, Editions du Rocher, 1999, p.31):
The disinformation operation could not be better summed up than by quoting the presentation of these polls as Le Point magazine dared to do, in a Reuters dispatch:
“Marine Le Pen panics the counters in view of 2012 – Marine Le Pen seems on the way to winning her bet to be in the second round of the presidential election with spectacular polls which suggest that the National Front has not only changed its first name but also its image. Launched at high speed towards her declared objective, the new president of the FN would win in the first round in all cases according to a Harris Interactive survey published on Tuesday by Le Parisien. Beyond the controversies over the methodology used to consecrate the daughter of Jean-Marie Le Pen queen of the polls, the analysts insist on the wave which carries it towards the tops”. http://www.lepoint.fr/fil-info-reuters/marine-le-pen-affole-les-compteurs-en-vue-de-2012-08-03-2011-1303935_240.php
14 months before the deadline, when no one knows who the real candidates will be and when the long electoral campaign will only really begin in about 8 months, the magazine Le Point has already "consecrated" Marine Le Pen as "queen of the polls" [sic] and has the nerve to say that she “seems on the way to succeeding in its bet to be in the second round of the presidential election”. As for the total lack of scientificity of these so-called "polls", the magazine evacuates it with a simple incident: “Beyond the controversies over the methodology used…” [so].
Which is exactly the same as saying:
“Beyond the fact that these polls are fake, they are still true. »
In terms of staging and misinformation, this is called “setting the scene”. From now on, all the political commentaries will be able to gloss ad infinitum on the presence of Mrs. Le Pen in the second round of the presidential election. And all subsequent polls will feel more or less obliged not to stray too far from these Harris Interactive "polls", even if it means making the most unjustified "adjustments".
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------
3 – THE DENUNCIATION OF A MANIPULATOR, BUT NOT OF THE MANIPULATORS
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------
Professionals in politics, and in particular deputies and senators who know the field well, are well aware that the situation is currently very bad in France. But they also know that the FN (which only obtained the meager score of 2,45% of registered voters in the European elections of June 2009) did not win 1 vote out of 4, one year and half after.
This is why the so-called "poll" published on March 5 by Le Parisien brought back to the fore a bill adopted at first reading by the Senate, and jointly defended by the PS Jean-Pierre Sueur and the UMP. Hugues Portelli to better regulate polls.
A few days ago, on March 3, 2011, the magazine Marianne, had precisely gone to question Mr. Jean-Daniel Lévy, director of the opinion department of Harris Interactive France, to ask him why he was rebelling against this bill - passed at the unanimity. To which the head of Harris Interactive France had replied, of course after having reaffirmed his concern for "transparency": « We don't believe that polls shape opinion. […]
At Harris Interactive, we do not support the release of raw data, margins of error, and the introduction of a 24 hour delay between the end of a survey and its publication”. http://www.marianne2.fr/Sondages-pour-JD-Levy-Harris-Interactive--le-commanditaire-doit-etre-transparent_a203403.html
If you think about it, that answer is an admission. Because a polling institute worthy of the name, if it only had in mind the scientific reliability of the studies it produces, should be the first to want to increase the level of requirements of the law in order to prevent disinformation agencies do not harm the profession. By opposing, on the contrary, the legislative enactment of better controls of the "polls" produced, Harris Interactive France has thrown off the mask: it is not there to enlighten opinion but to distort it.
Moreover, the great politicians are no more fooled by this deliberate misinformation.
Questioned on RMC radio, the former Socialist Minister of Foreign Affairs Roland Dumas did not hide that he thought that this "poll", which he described as a "joke", was only a manipulation:
“But Marine Le Pen is not scary… Even the father was not scary. The last time, it was a joke, the threat of Le Pen…., we made all the socialists vote like idiots who went to vote to vote for Juppé or I don't know who, for Chirac, This poll is very interesting but not as we hear it… Me, I think that this survey was well presented in a way to scare, it is necessary to scare… this survey it's a joke»
"Marine Le Pen? It's a joke!" Roland... by lesgrandesgueules
Ségolène Royal, socialist candidate in the 2007 election, had preceded him on this path by not mincing words: “I have long thought that polls are part of a manipulation of opinion. Those who sponsor the polls think that as they go along, they will end up influencing public opinion.
Curiously, neither Ségolène Royal, nor Roland Dumas, nor any of the political leaders who made it known that these alleged polls were in their eyes a manipulation, went to the end of the reasoning: if there is " manipulation", who are the "manipulators"?
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------
4 – BUT WHO IS HARRIS INTERACTIVE?
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------
What is finally the most astonishing in all this business, it is that nobody seems to have thought to examine who exactly was the "institute" Harris Interactive.
However, it is worth looking into.
Harris Interactive France is only a very small company, which only includes about fifty people. On the other hand, it is the subsidiary of a much more powerful group, the American group Harris Interactive, which has nearly 1 people worldwide.
Harris Interactive is headquartered in New York (161 Sixth Avenue, New York NY 10013) and the group is governed by a 7-member Board of Directors, listed at http://ir.harrisinteractives.com/directors.cfm
Among these leading members, two deserve our special attention.
The CEO of Harris Interactive has been selected by the White House and the FBI
The personality of the CEO of the American group Harris Interactive, Mrs. Kimberly Till, is unusual and quite unexpected at the head of a polling institute.
Presented as a "global leader", Ms. Till was previously CEO of the opinion poll institute Taylor Nelson Sofres for North America (from May 2006 to March 2008), after having been vice president of a subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation (from 2003 to 2008) and, before that, a senior manager of the AOL Time Warner group, in media-related jobs.
Moreover, Ms. Kimberly TILL, CEO of Harris Interactive, has served in the corridors of power in Washington, notably as special assistant to the director of the FBI. She is a member of the famous CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)
More interestingly, Mrs. Till was selected in 1990 to follow the highly prestigious White House Fellowship Program. Founded in 1964 by President Johnson, the White House Fellowship Program was designed to offer fifteen or so selected young men and women the opportunity to work for a time at the highest level of the federal government before going "swarm" into the private sphere.
As stated on the White House's own website, "this non-partisan program" allows, in the words of President Johnson, "to give scholars first-hand, high-level experience of the workings of the federal government and 'increase their sense of participation in national affairs'. In return for this year of experience, President Johnson felt that "fellows should 'repay that privilege' ['repay that privilege' according to the American formula], after their departure, by continuing to work as citizens at their public duty. In particular, he hoped “that fellows could help serve the nation as future leaders”. http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/fellows (see photos of the last promotion on http://www.flickr.com/photos/40021250@N05/with/4291737802/)
To put it more directly, the former trainees of the “White House Fellowship” Program are supposed to serve, during the rest of their active life, the American governmental authorities whatever the professional functions, public or private, that they are brought to exercise. In short, they are seen and used as agents of influence in the service of higher American interests.
With regard to Ms. Till, it should be noted that, during her time in the "White House Fellowship" Program, the current CEO of Harris Interactive became the special assistant to the United States Trade Representative (the head of trade negotiations at the World Trade Organization), then Special Assistant to the Director of the FBI.
Remember that the FBI ("Federal Bureau of Investigation" or "Federal Bureau of Investigation") is the main United States federal law enforcement agency and a domestic intelligence service. As of 2010, the FBI's jurisdiction covers more than 200 categories of federal crimes, making the FBI the major investigative agency of the US government, its attributions including in particular "anti-terrorism", "counterintelligence" and " computer crime.
FBI logo - the current CEO of Harris Interactive was a special assistant to the director of the FBI.
Finally, it is useful to know that Ms Till has been selected as a member of the very famous Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (Council on Foreign Relations), which is considered one of the most influential American "think tanks" and which is at the heart of many controversies about its exact role in American politics (cf. for example http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations )
CFR logo - the current CEO of Harris Interactive is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, one of the most powerful lobbies in the United States, often compared by its detractors to a real government imposing its will.
Frenchman Antoine Treuille, member of the board of directors of Harris Interactive, is also the President of the French American Foundation
-------------------------------------------------- ------------
Among the 6 other members of the Board of Directors of the Harris Interactive Group, there is a Frenchman, named Antoine Treuille, whose personality is even less banal and even more unexpected, at the head of a polling institute. American, as Mrs. Kimberly Till is.
On the photo on the left you can see Mr. Antoine TREUILLE (on the right), member of the board of directors of Harris Interactive, is also president of the French American Foundation (with David de ROTHSCHILD, on the left)
Mr. Antoine Treuille, who was born in the United States, is a partner in an investment fund called Altamont Capital Partners. But it has the particularity of being:
- an officer of the French army,
- and, even more, to be, since 2008, the president of the French American Foundation.
Readers who are unaware of what this association is exactly - which is one of the cornerstones of Euro-Atlanticism in France - will profit from the deciphering of it by Pierre Hillard (for example in "Un relais des Etats United in France »: http://www.voltairenet.org/article146888.html or “the French-American Foundation, discreet lobby of Euro-Atlanticism”: http://www.revue-republicaine.fr/spip.php?article1347 )
Remember that, according to Pierre Hillard, “the American and French names, members of the Young Leaders [selected by the FAF], are truly an elite whose official objective is to “strengthen the Franco-American relationship considered as an essential element of the transatlantic partnership”. On the American side, we can take up President Bill Clinton; his wife, Hillary Clinton; the ex-boss of NATO in Europe, General Wesley Clark... The list is long. In the case of the French Young Leaders, we find many journalists like Christine Ockrent, Jean-Marie Colombani (Le Monde), Emmanuel Chain, Jérôme Clément (president of ARTE); but also many socialist deputies, François Hollande, Pierre Moscovici, Arnaud Montebourg; and from the UMP, Alain Juppé, Yves Censi, Valérie Pécresse, Philippe Auberger, Jacques Toubon, Eric Raoult or even Nicolas Dupont-Aignan…”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 – HARRIS INTERACTIVE IS ALSO VERY ACTIVE IN PROMOTING “DSK”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be a mistake to believe that Harris Interactive has limited its political action, over the past month, to the sole dissemination and promotion of "polls" devoid of any scientificity propelling Ms. Le Pen to the second round of the presidential election. He was also very active in promoting the candidacy of Mr. Strauss-Kahn for the presidency of the Republic by publishing, on February 18, a dithyrambic study about him: http://www.harrisinteractive.fr/news/2011/18022011.asp
According to Harris Interactive, this study shows that:
"1. Dominique Strauss-Kahn currently has, for the French, the stature of a presidential candidate, his competence and his capacity to represent France abroad being recognized by a majority of them, and this whatever their political proximity.
2. Slightly more than one in two French people even believe that he would make a good President of the Republic, that he has good ideas for France and that he could reform the country in the right direction.
3. However, it suffers from a lack of proximity: a majority thus doubts its good understanding of citizens' concerns. We can see in this one of the consequences of his estrangement from the French political scene. This reproach has often been addressed, by the French through polls, to the current leader of the IMF.
4. The majority of socialist sympathizers recognize all the qualities tested in him, but the majority of right-wing sympathizers agree with them on half of the qualifiers, namely: competence, capacity for representation abroad, courage and sympathy. Note also that Front de Gauche sympathizers give him these four image traits, and far-left sympathizers three of them (all except sympathy).
5. Dominique Strauss-Kahn thus appears to benefit globally with his core target (socialist sympathizers) but also with all French people from a better image than Ségolène Royal”.
In short, Harris Interactive has already chosen: Mr. Strauss-Kahn has all the qualities and he must be the candidate of the socialists. This is information that fell right on the spot. Because at the same time, the magazine L'Express precisely devoted its cover to "DSK OBJECTIF ELYSEE".
------------------------------------
6 - A WELL-REGULATED BALLET
------------------------------------
The orchestration of the operation was very neat since, as in a perfectly well-regulated ballet, a certain number of protagonists have already fulfilled the role assigned to them.
José Bové opened the ball by affirming, from Wednesday February 23, that if there was a "risk of reproduction of April 21, 2002, it would be necessary for the candidate (of Europe Ecologie-Les Verts) to withdraw ".
“For the moment, we are maintaining a candidacy. On the other hand, we give ourselves the possibility 3, 4, 5 months before the election, if we are in this situation, to withdraw our candidacy."
(Opinion shared by Daniel Cohn-Bendit, cf. http://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2011/02/24/le-candidat-ecologiste-pourrait-se-retirer-pour-eviter-un-nouveau-21-avril_1484554_823448.html)
A few days after the publication of the Harris Interactive polls, it was François Hollande who joined this movement, pleading "for a united front of the left from 1er trip"
http://blogs.lesechos.fr/guillaume-tabard/ps-entre-peur-et-primaires-a5252.html
Then it was the turn of Ms. Kosciusko-Morizet, Minister of Ecology, Sustainable Development, Transport and Housing, who announced on March 9 that “against the FN, she chose the PS”.
http://www.marianne2.fr/Face-au-FN-Kosciusko-Morizet-choisit-le-PS_a203647.html?com
Remember that Ms. Kosciusko-Morizet is "Young Leader" of the French American Foundation, class of 2005-2006
http://www.frenchamerican.org/cms/youngleaders?nid=349
This movement was followed, in view of the next cantonal elections, by declarations by Gérard Larcher who also announced that he would vote " Of course " PS, and Laurent Hénart, right arm of Jean-Louis Borloo, who announced that he would vote " obviously » P.S.
http://blogs.lesechos.fr/guillaume-tabard/l-ump-et-la-tentation-du-front-republicain-a5259.html
----------------------------------------------
CONCLUSION
----------------------------------------------
It is absolutely excluded that the so-called "poll" published on March 5 and giving Mrs Le Pen the lead of the 1er tour of the presidential election could have been conducted and broadcast by the simple small French subsidiary of 50 people of Harris Interactive France, without the latter having, at least, warned the headquarters of the American polling institute.
Because everyone – and above all the institute itself! – could perfectly measure in advance the extremely sensitive nature of such information, the controversy it would inevitably provoke and the possible problems it could pose for the French authorities in office.
Better still, the exceptional media coverage that has been organized around this so-called "poll", and the founding importance that the media are trying to give it to influence political debate in France over the coming year, prove that the entire operation has been carefully considered, and at a level that cannot be achieved by Harris Interactive's only French subsidiary.
Such a so-called "survey" was therefore necessarily authorized, and more probably ordered, by the CEO of the group, with at least the agreement of the French member of its board of directors, a French soldier with close ties to the American military and also president of the French American Foundation.
Those who still have doubts about the involvement of the American headquarters of Harris Interactive will no longer be able to have any if we recall that, the first survey published in France having made the front page of all the French media and having placed Harris Interactive France under the spotlight, the same institute confirmed and signed by publishing, two days later, a second survey confirming the first. To act in this way, it was imperative that the French subsidiary feel fully supported by the managers of the New York headquarters.
You don't have to know business life to imagine that Harris Interactive's global headquarters didn't follow the unfolding of all these twists and turns hour by hour.
To understand the Le Pen polls, we must therefore go up the chain of command and explain to the French that their origin is in the United States of America, at a polling institute chaired by a woman selected by the White House and the FBI ( and probably very close to the CIA) and to a board of directors on which sits a senior French officer, president of the famous French American Foundation (FAF) created by John Negroponte, whose explicit objective is to help select the leaders French for the greater benefit of the United States of America.
It is precisely because this research inevitably leads to American influence services that the denunciations made on the manipulation of these polls, in particular by Ségolène Royal, Roland Dumas or the Observatory of the polls have stopped on the way.
This file therefore fully confirms all the analyzes that the... has been carrying out for many months now:
- the System decided to have Mr. Strauss-Kahn elected at all costs as President of the French Republic in 2012;
- as usual for 28 years, the System has planned to use the base works of the FN to neutralize the 15 to 20% of fateful voters who could oppose its projects, by dividing the French on controversial subjects and hateful;
- the two false polls, of March 5 and 7, 2011, presenting Mrs. Le Pen in the second round of the presidential election were designed for this purpose, as well as the hypermedia coverage of Mrs. Le Pen.
The objective of the fake Le Pen polls is threefold:
- organize a panic on the left to simplify the procedure for choosing the socialist candidate and impose Mr. Strauss-Kahn on the socialists;
- do everything to ensure that Mrs. Le Pen is present in the second round, in order to ensure Mr. Strauss-Kahn an election without firing a shot with more than 75% of the votes.
- take advantage of it in passing to smear any idea of national liberation, of leaving the EU and the euro, by maintaining confusion, in the minds of the electorate, between these saving and legitimate proposals on the one hand, and the xenophobic, racist and far-right obsessions of the FN on the other.
-----
We call on all our members and supporters to block these maneuvers sordid things that flout the highest principles of freedom and democracy.
We call all our members and supporters to unmask as widely as possible this FN-DSK collusion, the main orchestration of which is located across the Atlantic, as this analysis of the ins and outs of Harris Interactive reveals once again.
source: ...
Now that you have clearly identified the ins and outs, I will just remind you of the information I gave you, indicating that our American allies agitated Islamist groups on French soil...
Personally, I would like to start a civil war in France, I will not do better.
Failing to change the slogan, they should already change leaders...
So, to seal a century-old friendship, nothing beats a good visual message. I don't like to stoop to that, so I spared you, but still the stubborn Alice posted it on her Blog. Since we must give back to the imperial Caesar what belongs to him, here is the image that the devoted CNN imposes internationally through its very private channels, as a vision of France in 2025:
It's really the arsonist firefighter who lights fires all over the planet, so that no one realizes that his own barracks is burning. Finally, even if they strategically produce almost nothing at home, think about it when you spend your precious money; )
Just to temper this information, don't be terrified by the cold efficiency of our friends. Because integrate that very concretely the USA, for me, is not worth far from 0, and even less since they are technically already bankrupt. And everything they claim to own (recently), they acquired by speculating on their future future which they want 'better' via their debt (and their capacity in fact, not to repay it ;)). They've even mortgaged their property and so, like the cowboys they are, they're bluffing; ) But this is a bluff already calculated at 140,000 billion !!! that no one wants to finance ! And which insanely takes the whole planet in its wake. So for now it's going 'relatively and democratically well'. But when the tokens will become scarce (silver and gold, food or even energy), and the Chinese or others will have a vital need to very concretely possess their American assets and to materialize them physically, in Gold or Silver, given the condition supposedly from Fort Knox, the atmosphere is suddenly in danger of 'leading...'
Maybe someone should stop them in their ultimately illogical (?) madness (for normal people), before it ends badly?
But remember: out of chaos comes order! action=reaction. The global collapse of the system, and the induced loss of landmarks of the peoples, would be the perfect opportunity for the establishment of a military-based dictatorship, and financial base on a global scale, and therefore generalized, see additional information for some brushing structures.
Sincerely,
Folamour & Chalouette, on the trail of the enraged flyer.
Additional information :
Pierre Jovanovic Journalist the origin of... by webtele-libre
Terms & Conditions
Subscribe
Report
My comments