Terrifying, on the other hand you were warned of the21 Agenda from 2011, it's been 8 years… At the time few people talked about it, and few people still talk about it…
You have to believe that this is coming back to the forefront of the news, that's why ecology can be used as a motive for the worst designs which, as you have understood, are not new...
The elite's greatest fear is the demographic bomb... That's why they do nothing to fight against pesticides, endocrine disruptors, waves, etc., the more people eliminated the better.
And they rely heavily on the “ Social Darwinism to automatically eliminate all those who will not have access to education, because they are too poor.... While they will have an exponential income from generation to generation....
published: November 6, 2019
There was a time when the elite at least tried to hide their overflowing enthusiasm for population control from the general public, but today they don't even try to hide it anymore.
Tuesday, alarming new study which advocates global population control as one of the solutions to the "climate emergency" we face was published in the journal BioScience. This document has already been signed by 11.258 scientists from 153 different countries and openly calls for a reduction in the human population of our planet. This has always been the ultimate goal of the climate change cult, but today a great effort is being made to make the public believe that there is "scientific consensus" on the need for such a move.
You will find here a summary of the report, and I strongly encourage you to read it, because it is essentially an action plan for the future of the elite.
But to achieve their goals, they will first have to convince us that planetary catastrophe is imminent, and in this study the authors boldly tell us "that the planet Earth is facing a climate emergency"...
Scientists have a moral obligation to clearly warn humanity of any catastrophic threat and to "tell it like it is". Based on this obligation and the graphical indicators presented below, we declare, with more than 11.000 scientific signatories from around the world, clearly and unequivocally, that planet Earth is facing a climate emergency.
Sounds pretty scary, right?
What solutions do they offer?
Well, the study breaks down the necessary solutions into six basic groups...
The letter focuses on six key objectives: replacing fossil fuels; reduce pollutants like methane and soot; restore and protect ecosystems; eat less meat; convert the economy to a carbon-free economy, and stabilize population growth.
If it sounds a lot like the "Green New Deal", it's because it's a bit like the "Green New Deal".
It is the sixth "objective" that worries me the most. Because the truth is, they don't just want to "stabilize" the world's population.
According to the study, Earth's population really needs to be "gradually reduced"...
Still increasing by around 80 million people per year, or more than 200.000 people per day (figure 1a-b), the world's population must be stabilized and, ideally, gradually reduced, within a framework that ensures social integrity. There are proven and effective policies that enhance human rights while lowering fertility rates and mitigating the effects of population growth on GHG emissions and biodiversity loss. These policies make family planning services accessible to all, remove barriers to accessing these services, and achieve gender equality, including primary and secondary education as the global norm for all, especially girls and children. young women (Bongaarts and O'Neill 2018).
But if man is the main driver of climate change, and if we only have a dozen years left before reaching the point of no return as suggested Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, will a "gradual" reduction in the human population really be enough to satisfy climate change fanatics?
For true supporters of the cause, there would be no faster way to reverse this crisis than to drastically reduce the population of the planet. Each of us has a “carbon footprint,” they say, and as the population grows, the climate change crisis is only getting worse. So a logical extension of this thinking would be that anyone who could find a way to significantly reduce the world's population would literally be "saving the planet". For you and me, the idea of millions or billions of people dying is absolutely horrific, but for those who have fully bought into the climate change discourse, such an outcome would be extremely desirable.
And of course, population control has been an obsession of the global elite for a very long time. Long before "global warming" and "climate change" were popularized, those at the top of the social pyramid dreamed of culling the herd in spectacular fashion.
To demonstrate this, I would like to share with you 45 quotes that prove that the elite really want to drastically reduce the number of people on the planet...
1. Charles Darwin (his thought underlies so many of our scientific theories today): "At some future time, not so distant as the centuries measure, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace all over the world the savage races. At the same time, the anthropomorphic apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has pointed out, will no doubt be exterminated. The rupture will then be wider, for it will come between man in a more civilized state, as can be hope, that the Caucasus and certain apes as low as a baboon, instead of intervening as at present between the Negro or the Australian and the gorilla."
2. Bill Gates "The problem is that the population is growing fastest where people are least able to cope. So it is in the poorest places that the population will triple by 2050. (. ..) And we have to make sure we help them with the tools now so they don't have an impossible situation later."
3. Bernie Sanders "In poor countries around the world, where women do not necessarily want to have a large number of babies and where they can have the possibility, through contraception, to control the number of children they have, I support very, very firmly this idea.
4. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson "The main challenge facing our species is the reproduction of our species itself... It's time we had a mature discussion about the optimal amount of human beings in this country and on this planet... Everything shows that we can help reduce population growth and global poverty by promoting literacy, women's empowerment and access to contraception."
5. Sir David Attenborough, British television presenter "The human population can no longer grow in the same uncontrolled way. If we don't take care of our population size, then nature will for us."
6. Paul Ehrlich, former science adviser to President George W. Bush and author of "The Population Bomb": "Solving the population problem will not solve the problems of racism...sexism...religious intolerance... war... gross economic inequality. But if you don't solve the population problem, you won't solve any of these problems. Whatever problem you care about, you won't solve it unless you also solve the problem Population."
7. Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First: "We humans have become a disease, human smallpox."
8. Ted Turner, Founder of CNN : "A total population of 250 to 300 million, or 95% less than today, would be ideal."
9. Japanese Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso : on medical patients with serious illnesses: "You can't sleep well when you think everything is paid for by the government. It won't be solved if you don't let them hurry up and die."
10. David Rockefeller : "The negative impact of population growth on all our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident."
11. Richard Branson "The truth is this: Earth cannot provide enough food and fresh water for 10 billion people, let alone homes, roads, hospitals and schools."
12. Ecologist Roger Martin : "On a finite planet, the optimal population offering the best quality of life for all, is significantly smaller than the maximum, which allows survival. The more we are, the less we have for each one; the fewer there are people, the better."
13. Bill Maher, HBO personality "I'm pro-choice, I'm pro-assisted suicide, I'm pro-regular suicide, I'm all for anything that gets the freeway moving - that's what I do. It's too crowded, the planet is overpopulated and we must promote death."
14. Al Gore “One of the things we could do is change technologies, reduce pollution, stabilize the population, and one of the main ways to do that is to empower and educate girls and women. Fertility management needs to be ubiquitous so that women can choose the number of children to have, the spacing of births... We need to educate girls and empower women. strongest lever, and when that happens, the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better and more balanced choices."
15. Penny Chisholm, professor at MIT "The real trick, in trying to stabilize at a level below this 9 billion, is to bring down the birth rate in developing countries as fast as possible. And that will determine the level at which humans will stabilize on earth."
16. Julia Whitty, columnist for Mother Jones: "The only known solution to ecological overshoot is to slow our population growth faster than it is currently slowing, and reverse it at the same time that we slow down and reverse the rate at which we consume resources of the planet. The success of this dual endeavor will solve our most pressing global problems: climate change, food scarcity, water supply, immigration, health care, biodiversity loss and even On the one hand, we have already made unprecedented progress, reducing world fertility from an average of 4,92 children per woman in 1950 to 2,56 today - a trial and sometimes d brutal mistake, but also the result of one woman at a time making her own choices. The speed of this reproductive revolution, which is swimming hard against biological programming, is considered our greatest feat. active to date."
17. Philip Cafaro, professor at Colorado State University, in an article titled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Halting human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition to prevent catastrophic global climate change. necessary to considerably reduce the current human resources.
18. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka "I have two grandchildren and I want them to inherit a stable Earth. But I fear for them. Humans have overpopulated the Earth and in doing so have created an ideal nutritional substrate on which bacteria and virus (germs) can grow and thrive. We behave like bacteria growing on an agar plate, until natural limits are reached or until another microbe colonizes and takes over, using them as a resource. In addition to our extremely high population density, we are social and mobile, exactly the conditions that favor the growth and spread of disease-causing (pathogenic) microbes. I believe it's only a matter of time before the microbes regain control of our population, since we don't want to control it ourselves. This idea has been embraced by environmentalists for at least four decades and is not new. People don't want to hear it."
19. Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations from 1997 to 2006 : "The idea that population growth guarantees a better life - financially or otherwise - is a myth that only those who sell nappies, prams and the like have a right to believe."
20. Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, United Nations Under-Secretary General from 2000 to 2010 "We cannot meet the massive challenges of poverty, hunger, disease and environmental destruction if we do not address population and reproductive health issues".
21. Bill nye : "In 1750, there were approximately one billion humans in the world. Today, there are well over seven billion people in the world. It has more than doubled in my lifetime. All those people who try to live as we do in developed countries are filling the atmosphere with far more carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases than it did centuries ago. It's the speed at which it's changing that will pose problem to so many large human populations in the world."
22. Actress Cameron Diaz "I think women are afraid to say they don't want kids because they're going to be rejected. But I think that's changing now too. I have more girlfriends who don't have children. children than those who have them. And, honestly? We don't need more children. We have plenty of people on this planet."
23. Democratic strategist Steven Rattner "We need death charts. Maybe not exactly, but if we don't start allocating health care resources more carefully - rationing them under their own name - the costs of health care will explode. medicare will overwhelm the federal budget."
24. Matthew Yglesias, economics and business correspondent for Slate, in an article entitled "The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart": "But not only is this spending on health care for the elderly the biggest issue in the federal budget, but our disproportionate allocation funds for health care for the elderly certainly explains the remarkable lack of cost-effectiveness of the American health care system.When the patient is already over 80, the simple fact is that no treatment can work miracles in terms of life expectancy or quality of life.
25. Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood "All our problems are the result of overproduction in the working class".
26. Gloria Steinem "Not everyone with a womb needs to have a child any more than those with vocal cords need to be opera singers."
27. Jane Goodall "It's the growth of our population that underlies just about every problem we've inflicted on the planet. If there were only a few of us, then the bad things we we do wouldn't really matter and Mother Nature would take care of it - but there are so many of us."
28. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States "Honestly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided there were concerns about population growth and especially population growth that we don't want to have too much of."
29. Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood : "The most merciful thing the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill him."
30. Living room columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article titled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?” Not all life is equal. It's a hard thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we sound like death-loving stormtroopers, killing your grandmother and your precious baby. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides."
31. Paul Ehrlich "So there are basically only two kinds of solutions to the population problem. One is a 'birth rate solution', in which we find ways to lower the birth rate. The other is a "solution to the problem of the death rate", in which the means to increase the death rate - war, famine, pestilence - find us."
32. Alberto Giubilini from Monash University in Melbourne, Australia and Francesca Minerva from the University of Melbourne in an article published in the Journal of Medical Ethics: "When circumstances arise after birth such that they would have warranted abortion, what we call abortion after birth should be permitted. We propose to calling this practice "abortion after birth", rather than "infanticide", to emphasize that the moral status of the person killed is comparable to that of a fetus...rather than that of a child. we affirm that killing a newborn could be ethically acceptable in all circumstances in which abortion is performed. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but where the well-being of the family is at risk."
33. Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: "We must continue to reduce the rate of growth of the world's population; the planet can no longer support many more people."
34. Barack Obama's top science adviser, John Holden : "A program for sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men."
35. Another quote from John Holden "If population control measures are not put in place immediately and effectively, all the technology that man can implement will fail to ward off the misery to come."
36. David Brower, the Sierra Club's first general manager: "All prospective parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, with the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen to have children."
37. Maurice Strong "Either we voluntarily reduce the world's population, or nature will do it for us, but brutally."
38. Tom Ferguson, former official of the Bureau of Population Affairs of the United States Department of State: "There is one theme behind all our work: we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, by beautiful clean methods, either they will have the kind of disorder we have in El Salvador, Iran or Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once the population gets out of control, it takes an authoritarian, even fascist, government to bring it down. ."
39. Mikhail Gorbachev "We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, abortion, values that control the population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the demographic crisis. Reduce the population by 90% and there is no there aren't enough people left to do a lot of ecological damage."
40. Jacques costeau "To stabilize the world's population, we must eliminate 350.000 people a day. It's a horrible thing to say, but it's just as horrible not to say it."
41. The Finnish Environmentalist Pentti Lincoln "If there was a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitation if it meant the death of millions of people".
42. AuthorDan Brown "Overpopulation is such a deep problem that we all have to ask ourselves what needs to be done."
43. Prince phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wide Fund for Nature: "If I reincarnate, I would like to come back as a deadly virus, in order to help solve the problem of overpopulation."
44. Ashley Judd : "It is unreasonable to reproduce, with the number of children who die of hunger in poor countries."
45. Charles Darwin "Among savages, the weak in body or mind are quickly eliminated, and those who survive generally show a vigorous state of health. We civilized men, on the other hand, do our utmost to control the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbeciles, the mutilated and the sick; we institute poor relations; and our doctors do their utmost to save the life of every one until the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has saved thousands who, of weak constitution, would once have succumbed to smallpox. It is thus that the weak members of civilized societies propagate their species. No one who has engaged in the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be very detrimental to the race of man. It is surprising how quickly lack of care, or misdirected care, leads to degeneracy. that of a domestic race; but, except in the case of man himself, hardly anyone is so ignorant as to let his worst animals breed."
As you can see, this way of thinking dates back to Charles Darwin.
The elite really look down on us all with great contempt, and hope that their goal of drastically reducing the size of the human population doesn't come to fruition anytime soon.
source: blacklistednews
Further information :
Crashdebug.fr: Documentary: Brussels the real power…
Terms & Conditions
Subscribe
Report
My comments