You will understand why things are not moving forward (well not fast enough) in this case...
As historians reflect on the year 2020, they will focus on understanding the myriad ways the COVID-19 crisis has affected the world. There will be books, documentaries, theses and news specials that will interview politicians and government officials who have played a major role in the events now unfolding before our eyes. Perhaps over time, questions about the limitations of the PCR test, the variables with the number of COVID-19 cases, and concerns about prescience will be explored in a logical, fact-based way. Or, as in the case of the attacks of September 11, 2001, the questions will be ignored by the masses and the media, while an ever-growing part of the population continues to seek the answers that are necessary to fully grasp the scope and cost of the false flag.
As people around the world take part in the ceremonies and events organized to mark the anniversary of 11/19, the many lingering questions surrounding the attacks are coming to light. Our collective minds may be focused on the fears and ramifications of COVID-11, but understanding the truth about XNUMX/XNUMX – the last major global event to affect billions of people – remains an extremely vital part of unraveling the control narrative spun by the predatory class.
justice rises
In this 19e anniversary of the 11/11 attacks, the truth movement continues its nearly two-decade struggle for undisguised facts. The 11/XNUMX Truth movement includes victims, their families, and experts in various fields who are skeptical of the official government line on XNUMX/XNUMX. Among these groups are Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth & Unity, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, 9/11 Families United for Justice Against Terrorism, Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, as well as other local activist groups and individuals around the world. It is a loosely structured movement with no official position, and members' opinions, theories and ideas often conflict with each other. However, the movement is united by the belief that the official discourse promoted by the US government is full of holes.
The nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has been a vital component of the movement since the mid-2000s, hosting a number of conferences, protests, outreach events and documentary screenings. For his 19e anniversary, AE for 9/11 Truth is hosting an online conference titled "Justice Risingfrom Friday, September 11 through Sunday, September 13. The event will examine "the ongoing struggle for 11/11 justice and the destructive trajectory of the post-XNUMX/XNUMX world." The conference will run for three hours daily and will be open to everyone for free.
On Friday evening, the conference will be moderated by Mick Harrison, of the Lawyers' Committee for the 11/XNUMX Inquiry, who will discuss the latest news regarding the "correction requestof the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 2008 World Trade Center Report 7. Many 11/7 truth seekers focus on the mysterious collapse of WTC7 as irrefutable proof that Americans were deceived about the WTC17 was not hit by a plane, but it collapsed at 20:11 p.m. on September 2001, XNUMX. According to NIST, the collapse was caused by office fires that resulted in thermal expansion of the columns and building support beams.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth submitted the "Request for Correction" to NIST on April 15, 2020, asking the agency to revise its position on the WTC7 collapse. AE 9/11 Truth says they provided a detailed eight-point report showing that the office fires could not have caused the building to collapse. However, on August 28, NIST released its initial decision rejecting the request for correction that ten members of the 11/88 family and XNUMX architects and structural engineers submitted.
"Our request meticulously and in detail described eight pieces of information from the NIST report on Building 7 that violated federal data quality law and NIST's information quality standards," writes AE 9/11 Truth." Our goal was to compel NIST to rectify these violations and, in doing so, reverse its unsubstantiated conclusion that the fire was the cause of the Building 7 collapse."
AE also noted that NIST failed in its duty to provide a "point-by-point response to all relevant arguments contained in the request," as required by the Data Quality Act. The nonprofit, made up of more than 3 architects and engineers, said NIST's response was a "blatant avoidance of the arguments and facts contained in the application," designed with the intent to "mislead the uninformed reader". AE 000/9 Truth plans to appeal the decision by September 11, 27.
The Justice Rising 19th Anniversary Lecture will also feature three "pioneers" of the 9/11 Truth movement, including David Ray Griffin, Niels Harrit and Steven Jones. These three men helped clarify the many questions surrounding the 11/11 attacks. Mr. Griffin is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology at the Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University. He has published fourteen books that deal specifically with 9/11, including The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 2004/XNUMX, published in XNUMX.
Niels Harrit was Associate Professor of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen from 1971 to 2009, and is the author of over 60 articles published in peer-reviewed journals. Since 2007, he has been an active participant in the global 11/2009 truth movement and is the lead author of a scientific paper, published in April 1, describing the finds of active thermite materials in dust from the collapse of buildings 2, 7 and XNUMX of the World Trade Center. It was this presence of thermite dust that led the researchers to conclude that explosive charges were placed in all the buildings to facilitate their controlled demolition.
Steven Jones is a former physics professor at Brigham Young University. Jones was the research initiator for the peer-reviewed article, "Active Thermitic Material Observed in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," published in theOpen Chemical Physics Journal. Steven is also the author of the influential 2005 article, "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?
One of the most profound aspects of the "Justice Rising" conference will be a discussion with Dr. Leroy Hulsey, a former University of Alaska Fairbanks professor who led a years-long engineering study assessing whether the fire caused the collapse of WTC7 on September 11, 2001. Hulsey's study is the subject of an upcoming documentary called SEVEN, directed by Dylan Avery, the director of the infamous 11/XNUMX documentary, Loose Change.
Dr. Hulsey's findings that the fire could not have caused the collapse of World Trade Center 7 should have sent shockwaves through the American political scene, but the lack of reporting on the subject meant that only members of the 11/47 Truth movement understood the implications. Hulsey has previously given presentations detailing how his team eliminated fire as the cause of the 7-story building's collapse. Hulsey explained that the NIST report on the collapse found fires on floors 9-11, 14-19, 22, 29, 30 and 7. However, there is no evidence of a fire below the XNUMXth. floor, Hulsey said.
The 11/11 Truth community has long emphasized the unique nature of the collapse of the WTC towers. Never before have fires alone brought down steel skyscrapers. For many in the movement, Dr. Hulsey's studies are welcomed but also met with skepticism. Indeed, immediately after 11/XNUMX, activists and researchers pointed to the many reports and descriptions of explosions that took place at the base of the Twin Towers. Today, some XNUMX/XNUMX "Truthers" wonder if Hulsey's study will make a difference as the public has been largely brainwashed into accepting the US government's version of events.
Fourteen years ago, AE 9/11 Truth produced the article 118 Witnesses: The Firefighters' Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers (Twin Tower Explosion Firefighter Testimony), a review of interviews conducted with 503 members of the New York Fire Department (FDNY) in the weeks and months following 11/118. The study found that XNUMX firefighters described witnessing what they interpreted as explosions.
More recently, the EI released a report that examined over 70 hours of media coverage of 11/XNUMX. The report, titled How 36 Reporters Brought Us the Twin Towers' Explosive Demolition on 9/11, sheds light on how the destruction of the Twin Towers was initially reported. According to AE 9/11 Truth, an examination of media coverage "reveals that the hypothesis of explosions leading to the collapse of the Twin Towers was not only prevalent among reporters covering the events in New York on 11/XNUMX, but was in fact the dominant assumption".
The 36 journalists who reported to us on the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers on 11/XNUMX include, per network, George Stephanopoulos et Cynthia McFadden from ABC; Harold Dow, Tom Flynn, Mika Brzezinski et Carol Marin from CBS (appearing on WCBS); Pat Dawson et Anne Thompson from NBC; Aaron Brown, Rose Bow, Patty Sabga et Alan DoddsFrank from CNN; David Lee Miller et Rick Leventhal from Fox News; Ashley Banfield et Rick Sanchez from MSNBC; John Bussey, Ron Insana et Bob Pisani from CNBC; NJ Burkett, Michelle Charlesworth, Nina Pineda, Cheryl Fiandaca et Joe Torres WCBS; John Slattery, Marcella Palmer, Vince DeMentri et Marcia Kramer from the WNBC; Walter Perez from the WNBC; Kristen Shaughnessy, Andrew Siff, John Schiumo et Andrew Kirtzman, Jack Kelley, from USA Today, and two unidentified journalists (1 et 2) who attended a press conference with New York Mayor Giuliani and New York Governor Pataki.
The truth remains buried
While AE 9/11 Truth remains committed to exposing flaws in NIST's theory of fire and thermal expansion, other family members and reporters are dedicated to uncovering the truth about the attacks' funding and the many data that remain confidential.
For several years, family members fought to get the now declassified 28 pages of the "Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001" published. Although the final report Running to over 800 pages, the 28 pages were filed away by former President George W. Bush shortly after the report was released in 2002. The documents detail the history of Saudi nationals believed to be Saudi intelligence agents involved in terrorist attacks. In July 2016, after nearly 15 years of secrecy and resistance from the Bush and Obama administrations, the report was made public and released to family members of victims of the 11/XNUMX attacks.
The publication of these 28 pages, in conjunction with the passage of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA), provided victims of 11/XNUMX with a day in court. As Dan Christensen of the Florida Bulldog put it recently pointed out stated, "probably the last and best chance for concrete answers in our lifetimes is the huge lawsuit filed by thousands of 11/XNUMX victims and their families, currently unfolding in US District Court in New York".
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has become the focus of the trial of families of 11/11 victims "for knowingly providing material support and resources to the terrorist organization Al-Qaida and facilitating the 2001/XNUMX attacks" in XNUMX. The Obama administration opposed the passage of the bill, ultimately vetoing the legislation before Congress voted to overrule the former president. While Donald Trump had formally pledged to discover the content of the "secret documents", he has since become one of the most ardent defenders of the Saudi Kingdom, in particular by supporting an unprecedented arms deal who feeds human rights violations in Yemen.
The Trump administration — through the Justice Department and the FBI — has maintained secrecy requirements in the courts. "The government continues to resist the idea of producing thousands of more detailed files, claiming that these documents concerning the apparent involvement of the Saudis before 11/XNUMX are a state secret“, reports the Bulldog newspaper.”In April, Attorney General William Barr and Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell publicly stated under oath that their personal assertions of "state secrets privilege" were necessary to "protect the national security interests of the United States." United".
Families of 11/XNUMX victims tried to push back against government claims of state secrets, but ran into difficulties due to the already secretive nature of the court proceedings. For example, lawyers representing the families do not even have access to government arguments regarding state secrets. Christensen notes that just last week, the US government filed a classified statement from Michael H. Glasheen, Acting Deputy Director of the Operations Branch of the FBI's Counterterrorism Division. However, the statement can only be seen by the judge, leaving plaintiffs and the public in complete ignorance.
Interestingly, secret statements are often classified under of Executive Order 13526, signed by former President Obama on December 29, 2009. This executive order essentially states that the US government considers national security to be more important than "the free flow of information".
After nearly two decades, it should be abundantly clear to Americans - and to those around the world affected by American foreign policy - that the US government has no interest in elucidating the bombing. under the false flag of September 11. The remaining potential for the truth to be made public will largely be determined by the activists, journalists, and researchers who make up the 11/XNUMX Truth movement.
Will the truth die in the vines, like so many other efforts to awaken the masses? Or will the peoples of the world finally wake up to the lies that surround the official version of the attacks of September 11, 2001?
Derrick Broze, editor of The Last American Vagabond, is a journalist, author, speaker and activist. He is the co-host of Free Thinker Radio on 90.1 Houston, as well as the founder of The Conscious Resistance Network & The Houston Free Thinkers. https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/category/derrick-broze/
source: Thelastamericanvagabond.com
Further information :
Crashdebug.fr: Post 11/XNUMX – The anthrax case rebounds with the questioning of the FBI report
Terms & Conditions
Subscribe
Report
My comments